More than earns his points as a Darkseid killer.
If your opponent's not playing Darkseid? A tad costly for what you get.
Glad we finally have "New Gods" keyword.

2 out of 3 turns he can heal up one click.
And for a cheap 4 points his ATA will give him a +1 Attack whenever you decide you really need it.

About time! I've been waiting for an updated Orion.

So you've got a 19 impervious Darkseid? Haha not anymore!

Apokalips again?....

For the Love of Darkseid, it is ApokOlips

Not A, an O

AAARRGGGHHHH!!!!

If you can avoid/neutralize your opponents Outwit pieces, then he just never dies. Invincible on top of auto-healing is just plain brutal. You push to hit me with a heavy object for 5 damage? OK, I'll take 2 damage then. I heal 1, then hit you. Then you clear, and I heal back to full. 3 damage now? OK, I'll take 1. . .

Were you just being sarcastic with this post? If not then I must tell you that in the D.C. universe the New Gods planet Apokalips is spelt with an A on purpose...just in case you didn't know.

In DC Comics: The Ultimate Character Guide, Apokolips is spelled with one a and 2 o's.
In Who's Who 1985, Apokolips is spelled with one a and 2 o's.
In Who's Who 1993, Apokolips is spelled with one a and 2 o's.
In Superman: The Animated Series Guide, Apokolips is spelled with one a and 2 o's.
And so on...

They make a new orion with no apokolips keyword. Wat????

I choose to read it wrong so that "give him a free action and heal him of 1 damage" means he can attack, move and cheat and gets to heal one for his trouble.

Since when is it spelt with an A and not an O? It's supposed to be Apokolips.

I must inform everyone that when referring to a specific planet, the p should also be capitalized. Such as the New Gods Planet Mutant Apocalypse. Just in case they didn't know, i am more than happy to come to the incredibly annoying & ill-informed rescue with another shiny pearl of wisdom. Anyhow, let me go on to list every power & ability he has verbatim & thorougly explain that power, & its situational applications, as if the dial & card were visible to only myself- holder of the only PAC & rulebook in print. Words words words. CAPITAL LETTERS. Several exclamatory statements of the obvious! In a row! To establish excitement! Oops, almost forgot to question someones comment/opinion with condescension. Ah well, lots of free time to post on every other fig!

Anyone else find it amusing that the second sentence here is a sentence fragment? I like the grammatical ambiguity of "incredibly annoying & ill-informed rescue"; is your rescue ill-informed and annoying or, less likely based on wording, the thing you are coming to the rescue of? It's spelled "thoroughly", in case the little red line under the word as you typed it didn't tip you off that you'd spelled it wrong. It'd also be "someone's" vice "someones", as you are using a possessive form and not referring to multiple someones. Strictly speaking, you'd say, "...card were visible only to me" since you aren't being redundant for emphasis, as would be the case if you said, "I, myself, find the card to be visible" or some such. You wouldn't say "The card is visible to myself," would you? Well, given what the rest of your post implies about your actual skill with grammar, you might. At any rate, I've often found that being particularly scrutinizing of your own posts prior to hitting "Submit Reply" is the only way to keep people like me from showing people like you just how inferior your attempts at being an uninvited member of the Grammar Police truly are. Have a delightful day! :cool:

While I applaud your undeniable grasp of grammar & diction on a near perfectly constructed rebuttal, I am compelled to bring into question your appalling lack of perception/interpretation. I can't lie & say I didn't chuckle upon reading "grammatical ambiguity" (ok, I had a good laugh). While it can be challenging for some to figure out tone from the written (or typed) word, my sarcastic & completely cheeky post should not have missed its mark so poorly as such, & gone over such an intellectual & analytical head like yours (sarcasm). To be clear, I could care less about how someone on here spells their posts out, creative spelling can be humorous. I find it amusing when people get matter-of-fact about it, especially when they have their facts wrong while condescending someone else. Some are consistently condescending/annoying on here, & I enjoy poking a little fun here & there, but keep it light for the most part & try to stay relative to the figure & topic. Alternately, you have chosen to focus completely on the critical errors of my "unscrutinized" post, forsaking figure/comics/game. Let me level you out here, Bruce Almighty. Reality is that we are posting on a comment section based solely on a tiny plastic figurine, originating in a comic book, & his stat dial that stars in a game called heroclix. This is not an editorial for the New York Times, therefore no one, at least "myself", is particularly concerned if they have a typo here or there, etc. Hence, "Quick Reply". Pity, the flair & apparent talents of spelling good & stuff from "someone like you" have been wasted here on the realms, spotlighting my inferiority (lol). I can assure you, the impending lashing I might receive again for not reworking my HCrealms posts will keep me thinking twice about posting at all (sarcasm). Humor me, for a moment though, & tell me how long you "particularly scrutinized" your essay here? What with your double spacing after your first sentence, & your improper use of a semicolon? The intent of my entire post was to be amusing, not call someone out for spelling, again, on a comment section for plastic dollies. That would be absolutely ridiculous and quite unnecessary, right? Well, given what your post here implies about your actual skill with not being "ridiculous & unnecessary", you might argue to the contrary. Don't get me wrong, grammatical mastery, & self indulgence in it, can be an amazing tool...not unlike yourself. Not to be redundant there, & just so that statement doesn't get lost in ambiguity/translation, I am calling you an amazing tool. I apologize to the players trying to discuss the actual figure/topic at hand here that have to read this & the previous drivel, but I could not resist. PM me if you feel the need to further illustrate my "inferiority", & stop wasting others time, d--ch-.