That's the impression I got as well.

I think that's why it needs to spin, to orientate the maneuver template groves.

Want to move left or right? Spin then lock in a straight template.

Based on the pics from the Sphere, there are no 90 degree arcs to measure from.

http://cf.geekdo-images.com/images/pic1912802.jpg

Okay, another odd thing:

IIRC the base is NOT a perfect square, correct?

If you have to spin the base, there may actually be some "lateral" movement on the figure itself.

*sigh* Can't we just get the Sphere preview already!!!

I kind of assume the justification for the spin maneuver is that it's just a work-around to having to manufacture a new base type, just for the Borg. Because otherwise, with a 360 firing arc and no apparent forward/backward facing, I can't see why it would matter, either.

If the bases were perfectly square, a template would be super easy, all it would need to be is an "L" shape, to mark the location of one corner, but even without a dedicated template this could be achieved without too much trouble with the existing movement templates. Just grab the straight 1, set it side-by-side with the base so that it is flush with one corner, and it has the same effect as the "L" template - pick the mini up, set it back down with its new facing, and line the corner of the base up with the corner of the straight 1.

The bases aren't perfectly square, but they only look like they're about 2mm longer then they are wide, so to me it's a negligible difference.

In theory, if they were super precise in measuring, that could be worked around with an "L" shaped template as well, though. Just make the inside length of each arm of the L .5X wider than a base width (X = base length - base width), and line the front or back of the base up with the outer edge of the L, then pick it up and rotate it to the inner edge of the L.

Yeah, it's about 2-3 mm longer than it is wide.

Agreed! DS what is the point of having compromising pics of WKs people if you don't use them to get us early previews now and again?

The point of having those pictures is so they do not release the compromising pics they have of ME!!

*ahem* Logic would dictate that due to the past experience of 90 degree arcs which measure from the left corner to the right corner of the acrylic stand, that the same principle could utilized in this instance as well.

Anyway, you are correct, but I think that the mechanic could still be used with the way the stands work now.

Really? You think that you could reasonably allow players to kinda figure out where the front arc should be without it being marked? With your play environment of players as a potential sample size?

Think about them arguing about it. Then think about it every turn. Then think about it happening several times a turn.

:shudder:

I can't see that being done.

If they had intention of using either front or rear firing arcs in addition to the 360 degree firing they would have included it (like the YT-1300 has)

The regulars from MY VENUE? Absolutely not, but logical individuals for regular venues that aren't anal-retentive about everything should be able to work it out.

You have a point with that last part. We'll see what's up :D

I guess it means they won't be able to use upgrades that specify an arc, like Anti-matter mines or torpedoes, at all. That seems like a minor disadvantage, though, and I'm sure they'll have their own version of these things.

The movement news isn't quite what I expected, but it matches with what we saw in the show.

Great interview, and cant wait for the delta quadrant ships and the OP events!