Because you are the one who's here, and you're saying things like this.

I made a few short blunt posts. Do you really want me to explain why I was frantically posting while I was being blindsided by a bogus last second bandwagon?
Would the explanation I've given here have dissuaded you or anyone else if I shared it at the time?

Yes. I claimed vigilante on D2 right before you said that you had doubled me. I also said I didn't take your doubling because I didn't want to risk potentially taking our two townies (I took out Dboy sadly).

Your initial question was "Why bother posting at all?" which to me suggests that no, you in fact would not have believed me, and thus there was no reason whatsoever for me to be posting. Your follow up response does not jive with that at all, as you suddenly have turned and are asking why I didn't post a particular thing which would have been inconsequential at the time.

I didn't say he should be cleared to the rest of you. I'm asking what that new information does to your read on Sloonei right now.

Does the confirmation of a power equate to the confirmation of an alignment? Did you ask the necessary questions at the end of Day 3 before joining the bandwagon against Sloonei?

I know it was enough for you, your vote reflects that. What you've just described here is the problem, actually. All of that voting mindset you just described is very timid. These are the options you've presented to me:

1. No lynch -- inherently garbage and I don't know why anyone would do this.

2. Lynch the neutral claimant -- This is not inspired pro-town thinking, this is defaulting to an agreeable and inoffensive option.

3. Lynch Sloonei after adamical's revelation -- Not inherently garbage, but your treatment of it was underwhelming. You took one look at it, said "welp, okee dokee" and threw a vote on him. You didn't look into the issue. You just participated immediately. It looked premeditated.

Adamical will get his time on the hot seat. You're the one who is here right now. This question is silly.

Sure, I could tinfoil that read all day if I wanted to. I'm feeling comfortable with it at the moment.

killingjoke & afrcngy: Sloonei or Immortal_Raven?

Who do you find the most suspicious right now, KJ?

Since you maintain that you didn't receive a failure notice, then no. I likely wouldn't have changed. However, reiterating that at the time forces me to make a choice and believe either you or adam. But you didn't address it at all. You simply campaigned for Roy. Since you were also on the hotseat, I felt that not addressing it when you could have was a sign of guilt/avoidance. I didn't like it.

The combination of you posting and not addressing the pressure and giving the excuse of being busy was too much evidence against you in my book.

And what did you not like about the case against Roy?

@IR, could you address this post?

In light of JJJ's claim:

remove vote

Go back to JoH's 3 scenarios. #2 involved me or adam being scum buddies with Roy. Can we agree on that?

If I know it's not me, then logic says vote for adam. I just, it's a hard sell to believe adam would risk that play.

Given that I know it's not me and I'm pretty sure it's not kj101 via Afrcngy's power and the N2 write-up, what's your plan B after adam and myself are dead and the game keeps going.

Yes. Sorry. I got this game mixed up in my head with the other Christmas mafia game.

I would really like to hear more from adamical. Unfortunately for I_R, doctor is a hard claim to prove, but we haven't had any other townspeople claim doctor yet, so there is a small margin of validity to his claim. I am. I am not attempting to make a case for I_R, just stating my view of the situation at the moment.

That's a question I want you to answer. I'm not getting lynched by any sane person this phase, so the onus is on you to present an alternative reality and also to show why that reality is true.

There are possibilities, and I haven't already decided with finality that both you and adamical must be lynched in succession. I am open to hearing you out. Gimme the goods.

It could also have been explained via a scum MD. If scum MDed him N1 and saw some info displayed to the public, why not MD a suspected info gatherer N2? Especially knowing Silver would get protections. So now both of your cases are identical. Both can be explained by MD.

Then throw in my failure N1, adam's actions both targeting myself and Darkstone, and your alleged targeting of me N1 which was publicly known before adam's claim. You look bad by comparison. It was as if we got a full claim from you and adam busted it. It was a stronger case to me.

JJJ's info makes it look bad as does Roy's autopsy.

Drag is fairly common atm. It used to be more rare, but I'd say at least 80% of games have it now.