but but but Entities are Required

Wow too many of you posters are a sad bunch. Can't you just congratulate the winners rather try to make a point that none of you have about entities, as this event proves NOTHING, accept the winners ability to play his team well.

Sooo... Justin's team is only 287 as stated, what was the other 13 points he used? It says his build total was 300...?

Maybe 2 Blind Al?

It was a 2nd Blind Al.

Technically it proves that you don't need an entity to win a ROC. We have had to put up with nonsense posts such as this for a few weeks

So I think the fact that people are pointing out that the winning team didn't have an entity on it is fair comment.

Well I'm really sorry you have had to put up with such posts, but you are mistaken. This proves nothing of the sort. Only that the guy that won can outplay those people with those teams (not considering bad dice). To suggest anything else is nonsense.

Everyone knows that a ROC can be won without an entity. This was never a secret, and I defy you find a post that says otherwise.

It may have been implied but I doubt anybody was dumb enough to make such a ridiculous statement.

Are you saying that the team that won here is the new team to beat? That it couldn't be improved upon? That an entity couldn't offer this team an edge? If you are than please let me know so that I can write off your future posts (outside of the rules forum) as not worth the trouble.

Can we please get some new articles on the homepage so I don't have to keep looking at this guy's bicep?

It's not a bad bicep. Jealous?

Then go ahead and write me off. What could an entity do for this teamt? What would I drop to make it fit? Great teams like this are great becuz all the components fit together perfectly. U drop bill u loose. U drop the als you loose. U drop the plant u loose . It needs everything working together to win. Tossing on the flavor of the week won't make this team any better.

Grats to the winner. Sexy team man can't w8 for the chance to crush it.

Are you bluerat? That is who I was talking to.

I dunno, I think it definitely provides a dose of athleticism around here ....

no I am not. Thanks for the clarification. At first it seemed like you were someone who had a chip on there shoulder and would refuse to listen to anybody who didn't agree with u. Even if it was the truth. Which would've been sad . Yet in reality your just a guy with a chip on his shoulder who dosent understand team building. But if you're still willing to listen to other peoples input. Then at least u still have the desire to grow as a player and that's great. I apologize for thinking less of u.


P.s. You should be nicer to bluerat.

err... I said it proves you don't need an entity to win a ROC. How am I mistaken?

Oh...I am glad you changed your mind and you now agree with me.

err.. no I didn't say any of that.

I haven't noticed you being an idiot in any of you other posts so why are you starting now?

If you didn't get my explanation than I can't help you as you do not want it. I never changed anything as I said, this proves nothing other than the winners ability to field his team against those that he played and everyone knows that it isn't a requirement to win a ROC as the competition is not generally at the level of Worlds.

I feed off of the energy I'm given so if you find my reply less than intelligent than don't hesitate to look inward.


@bob; Thanks for continuing to judge someone you know nothing of. You were actually a little closer with your first assessment, which is to say that I have no intention of listening to someone of your mental age even if you are really good at team building. Think what you will as it is of no consequence to me. With your way of thinking I do not expect to see your name as a consistent place holder but time will tell who is right and who is wrong.

I may not have your team building ability and maybe that team is built to the numbers but that just means that it is less likely to stand it's ground against top teams and top players. Just because a couple guys had teams that had entities and lost does not mean that these results are indicative of what it takes to win at the top level.