You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
^^^ id like to know that as well. can a cavalry unit with an overwatch token resolve the range combat with a mb? im figuring yes but would like confirmation.
if the rules arbitrator makes mb/b allowable with bound SA on a rider doesnt that contradict the cavalry unit base rule to use the mount's combat dial whenever resolving ANY movement the cavalry unit makes? not to mention that it also states that on the MB rules...
so you mean to say that tazia is strong enough that when she bounds she can drag along her pegasus with her while throwing her spear? :D
Originally posted by Vinstrom_88 if the rules arbitrator makes mb/b allowable with bound SA on a rider doesnt that contradict the cavalry unit base rule to use the mount's combat dial whenever resolving ANY movement the cavalry unit makes? not to mention that it also states that on the MB rules...
Eh, not quite. What it says is this: "When a cavalry unit is given a move action, only the mount's speed value, special abilities, and proficiencies can be used to resolve the action." The key words are "move action." While Bound does cause your character to move, it is a ranged combat action, NOT a move action.
Quote
so you mean to say that tazia is strong enough that when she bounds she can drag along her pegasus with her while throwing her spear? :D
Vinstrom, I've read your argument and explained to you why it's incorrect. Bound is a combat ability; it's a ranged combat action, thus it can be used with Mounted Bound. You argue that you must use the mount to resolve any and all movements, and I've pointed out that this is not true. What will it take to convince you, then?
Originally posted by Veloxiraptor Vinstrom, I've read your argument and explained to you why it's incorrect. Bound is a combat ability; it's a ranged combat action, thus it can be used with Mounted Bound. You argue that you must use the mount to resolve any and all movements, and I've pointed out that this is not true. What will it take to convince you, then?
ok, my bad. i kinda get the picture now. after typing a long reply to argue my case it made me realize where im looking at it the wrong way. :D
I have a question: When you dismount you have to give an special action to your cavalry unit, ok?, then... Can you mount again with the same warrior and then still atack?. That action cost an action toquen and the atack cost an other one but one of the cavalry rules say: " Cavalry units do not take one click of damage from pushing". In theory you can atack with a cavalry unit turn by turn?
Lexo: no. Not turn by turn but 2 turns, 1 turn wait, again two turns, 1 turn wait. It is not because the unit doesn't get pushing damage, that it isn't pushed. It gets two tokens, so you cannot do anything with it after two turns...
I thought there's a rule that you can use all kinds of abilities, but only one which requires an action. So for example a figure can't use Weapon Master+Thunder Blow+Sweep together, not even 2 of them. Is that so? Because if yes, then Bound and Mounted Bound both need an action, so i don't see why they can do this. And if we say that MB is for the cavalry unit, and Bount is for the rider(so they both can be given an action) then since we're talking about different caracters we can't give the two actions simultaniously.
No offense, but americans can do such dumb things. Why can't i use a close combat and a ranged combat action together then? I can't believe that WK wanted this to happen. Also the fact that two abilities like Invulnerability or Magic resistance can stack is also dumb. How? How can i be double invulnerable??? Such failures are even worse than SM because these won't be fixed, though they should be.