2 Cybernetic Magician
2 Dekoichie the Battle Enchanted Locomotive
2 Tsukuyomi
2 Magician of Faith
2 Night Assailant
1 Morphing Jar
1 D. D. Warrior Lady
1 Breaker the Magical Warrior
1 Tribe Infecting Virus
1 Sinister Serpent
1 Sangan
1 Black Luster Soldier - EoTB

3 Scapegoat
2 Metamorphosis
2 Nobleman of Crossout
2 Messanger of Peace
1 Pot of Greed
1 Graceful Charity
1 Delinquent Duo
1 Heavy Storm
1 Giant Trunade
1 Lightning Vortex
1 Premature Burial
1 Snatch Steal
1 Mystical Space Typhoon
1 Swords of Revealing Light

1 Call of the Huanted
1 Torrential Tribute
1 Ring of Destriction
1 Mirror Force

17.19.4

sorry to say, but....this deck just looks like trying to combine Tsuku abuse with Cookie Cutter Chaos with Cybernetic Magician tossed into the mix....

If you want it to seem original...take out the Meta's and Soldier and such and actually use some more mons that'll BENEFIT from Cybernetic Magician's effect instead of trying to abuse the OTK which is...not all that great and easy to stop..

Try adding a brian control and take out a scapegoat, also can you rate/fix my deck

and I have not gotten your mirror force

thats one of the dumest remarks i have ever heard.

lets brake it down.

1. This is not cookie cutter. But is tsuku abuse. Not a mix.

2. Who said i wanted to be original?

3. With that^ said, why take out the most broken card in the game?

4. This is not even close to an OTK. Cybernetic can be abused providing many things. But none the less can be a very effective way to turn a crappy hand into a bunch of beatsticks. this ending the game. And most of the time, if i dont win that turn. I will have gone 1-1 discardign to destroy every monster they have via battle. And this is not counting Night Assaialnt and Serpent. Which can be +1 over and over again.

5. The last time i checked, serpent and night assailant benefited from his effect


Necros - Brain Control Might be nice, but the goats can both stall for me and be really great beatsticks...

EDIT: What mirror Force?

its not a bad idea but dekoichies are:

- 2 dekoichie
- 1 tsukuyomi

+ 1 sangan
+ 2 apprentice magician

woops. Forgot Sagan

But Dekocie stays. He provides a +1. And then with tsuku he benefits so much more. Thus giving me a lotof resources to help with The Cyber Mag. And enough recources to win the game. And with 3 Goats Apprenitce is so not useful..

1. Tossing in a few Light's and Dark's with Soldier is pretty much cookie cutter

2. No one, but it'd make it more fun

3. Cause it doesn't really fit at all...it just...sits there

4. 3 Scapegoat...Serpent...Assailant...and just saying to make mons beatsticks and end the game...that's the basic idea for the OTK.

5. I mean WEAK mons that can become 2000 (ASIDE from Sheep Tokens). And, in any case, the Magician benefits from the serpent and assailant, not the other way around.

1. If thats your idea of cookie cutter, I play Cookie Cutter. Since when was that a crime? Do you have a better argument? Do you have something else worth posting? Or are you just another whiny n00b who complains about deck contents, but doesn't acknowledge a poor card pool?
Let me know, please, because I'd hate to think someone would try to step up to me with a half-assed opinion.

2. Having fun and being competitive are 2 TOTALLY different things.

3. If BLS ever just sits in someones hand and does absolutely nothing give me a call.

4. In which case then everything is OTK right? Finding a win condition. Using the win Condition. All OTK's?

5. They Both would benifit ME. Not them Selves. I get beatsticks. I get a Flip Back from the Grave. I get serpent next Turn. All this is a way to get huge damage and mantian a massive amount of card advantage.

1. LOL, You call me the whiny n00b when you're the one using a n00b looking deck??? I'm speaking from 7 years of experience and from the many duels that I've witnessed and I've seen each of the three decks separately and your deck just looks like all 3 mashed in together.

2. Fun is the general idea of the game. If all you are is competitive then you're one of the people who will end up quitting when the good cards aren't around anymore.

3. Then you'd see my name on your Caller ID well over 300 times in a row with a different case each time that I've witnessed.

4. OTK's are using a specific way to just kill off the opponent. Just generally depleting their LP to 0 in one turn, regardless of when is not OTK, but stuff like Cybernetic Magician + Scapegoat for the whole purpose of simply making them 2000 for a massive attack would be an OTK.

5. Of course they benefit you. I never said they didn't. I said they don't benefit from Cybernetic Magician, but that it's the Magtician that benefits from them because of the fact that they can constantly be reused.

1. Did I call you a n00b? I simply asked you a series of questions, all of which you failed to acknowledge just so you could take the opportunity to stress an irrelevant argument.

2. I won't say that's an accurate depiction of my future in this game, but I will say that it's my choice nonetheless, and it really doesn't concern you why I do or why I do not play this game.

3. umm ok. that was a stupid argument. Lets leave that out of this.

4. Scapegoat + NA + Cybernetic = just another win condition, like Ring, BLS, etc.. The deck can do random damage just like any other deck, it just has additional win conditions. It is, by no means, the primary focus of the deck. It will not, by all probability, be the reason for the majority of the wins this deck can scratch up. Like I said, it's just another win condition.

5. And whats so bad about each card benefiting from each other? Ever hear of Synergy?

Seriously, I don't care if you disagree with my approach to building this deck. I don't care if you're one of those anti-CCC manaical fiends. I just really don't care. I do care and do want -'s and +'s and detailed opinions on those -'s and +'s. What advantage would those +'s have over those -'s? THAT'S why I posted this deck -- I did not post it to have an inane argument with someone that I have grown bored of and who's trying to prove a point that means nothing to me.

Don't like it? Don't say anything. Think you can do that? I welcome your opinions. Otherwise, go eat some ice cream, watch a movie, w/e... just don't waste my time.

And if you read my post, I DID put in some -'s and such. Nothing much to add that would be considered though.

Althought u DID put +'s and -'s. The only reason you gave was to make it more fun. Which is not somethign you would want to do in a competitive deck.

I jsut noticed i Had 41 cards and are making the following changes:

-2 Sak Armor
-Cylinder
+2 MoP

Thoughts?

if you have one lose trunade for royal decree, shouldnt hurt you much at all. and a monster to conside is greenkappa, tsuk can reuse it, clears obstacles for cyber powered up monsters, and if anything baits out noc. another option is ceasefire, it can save u from noc alot and is generally good.

I think a great addition to this deck would be Injection Fairy Lily. Sure the cost can be a bit much. However if you use this with Cybernetic Magician you can boost IFL attack to 2000 then attack and boost it again by 3000 in the damage step. Now that Injection Fairy Lily that used to be able to attack for 3400 damage can now attack for 5000 damage. This takes down Black Luster Soldier and then some.

I really dont like decree. And since this is not an aggressive deck its not necesary. And since i can wait for a lil bit, do some damage here and there. Then draw into heavy or trunade...And greenkappa can screw me 2...which is why just about know one runs himin the current meta.

Hmm. Never thought of Injection. But the deck is so tight for spots as it is. I will have to test this current deck some more, then try out any random changes like this.