You are currently viewing HCRealms.com, The Premier HeroClix Community, as a Guest. If you would like to participate in the community, please Register to join the discussion!
If you are having problems registering to an account, feel free to Contact Us.
Can Royal Oppression negate Fusion Summons and Ritual Summons?
Thanks!
Edit: Also, one more question -- since Dragged Down into the Grave cannot be activated if either of the players has no hand, I assume the same is true for Card Destruction. But the official site doesn't have a ruling on Card Destruction. Clarification?
You can use Royal Oppression on fusion monsters. Polymerization says right in the card text "and Special Summon the Fusion Monster from your Fusion Deck"
Quote
You can chain the effect of a face-up "Royal Oppression" to negate "Future Fusion" when the card is activated (placed face-up on the field). -- UDE Judges List
Ritual monsters are special summoned too.
Quote : Originally Posted by Buster Blader X
Edit: Also, one more question -- since Dragged Down into the Grave cannot be activated if either of the players has no hand, I assume the same is true for Card Destruction. But the official site doesn't have a ruling on Card Destruction. Clarification?
You can still activate Card Destruction, but if you or your opponent have no cards then you or that person will draw no cards.
Ritual Summoning gets no such privileges. There are only 3 types of summoning: Normal, Flip, and Special. Fusion Summons and Ritual Summons fall under Special Summoning, since their summonings are from the effects of Magic cards. Any rulebook (or the website) should tell you this.
Go ahead and use the Royal Oppression to negate your opponent's Demise and Doom Dozer. My Oppression Gadget deck just got better.
You can still activate Card Destruction, but if you or your opponent have no cards then you or that person will draw no cards.
Wrong. So very wrong.
If neither player has any cards in their hand then Card Destruction can't be played. This is because discarding and drawing is the effect of Card destruction and if one action of the card can't be made then the other action can't either. It's an all or nothing effect, like Creature Swap. So if neither player has any cards in their hand then Card Destruction can't even be activated.
If neither player has any cards in their hand then Card Destruction can't be played. This is because discarding and drawing is the effect of Card destruction and if one action of the card can't be made then the other action can't either. It's an all or nothing effect, like Creature Swap. So if neither player has any cards in their hand then Card Destruction can't even be activated.
If you read what I said... I didn't say if "both" players have no cards in their hands you can activate it. I said that if you or your opponent have no cards in hand then you can still activate it.
Besides the question I got from the post was more or less this
Can Card Destruction be activated if one person has no cards in hand. Which I answered "Yes you can..."
You can activate Card D as long as at least one of the players will discard and draw. If neither player has any cards in hand then it cannot just be sent to graveyard because you want to.
Royal Oppression can negate Fusion summons and Ritual summons IF it is active and face up before the activation of the card that allows the special summon. So you have to have it face up before they activate Advanced Ritual Art or Polymerization or use a monsters effect to special summon. You cannot chain Royal Oppression to Advanced Ritual art and still negate since it negates the activation and said card would have already been activated. It's a card that basically you just flip in their standby phase since there's very few ways to special summon and negate if it's face down. Only thing I can think of is Dark World wince they start their own new chains.
I'm sorry but I really would like a link to the judge's list that says you can activate Card Destruction if only one of the players have card(s) in hand. I'm under the strong impression that Card Destruction is a all or nothing effect.
My memory could be wrong, which I'm sure it is, since it has been a while since I've had to make a specific ruling call on Card Destruction like this.