Sawasdee krub,
I have many question to ask,some may already ask but please help me.



1.Coolent pod
If I use coolent pod do my opponent score point for it?
Coz the card didnt said "nobody score for it point".

2.Wahab Fusili's NOBLE SACRIFICE
If another unit become target and Wahab is behind Blocking,could I force my opponent to make indirect to Wahab?

3.Moriko Horiama's SWEEPING BLOW
The card said opponent move unit away from Moriko 4",do she still make AoD that turn?
And if unit without JJ can move 4" away and move cross Blocking? so she have to use indirect to him that unit.

4.F-031,HS Faction pride
If I use this FP choosng AP and make arty attack,that pog still have AP?

5.Quad Mech with Flamer
If I put flamer in Quad Mech and make CC to vehicle is it alway making only 2 damage?

Thanks for your help.
:)

opp... Post in the wrong forum.
My bad
><"

If you use it, because it doesn't say no-one scores points for its elimination then your opponent will get VC1 for it.


No. If the target has been declared and the attack is a direct one then Wahab is not a legal target. For Noble Sacrifice to work, he must be a legal target.


The only stipulation is that the unit be placed 4" away and in the front arc. It isn't an action for Moriko so she can be given an order but the move could hop over blocking, yes.


Now this is an interesting question to which I do not have an answer. Let me think on it. After all it does say "for the attack" and so does it matter that the attack doesn't resolve until the following command stage?


No. Flamers override that rule and deal the damage value of the slot to which it is attached.

This is an "ask on the official forums so the Rules Arbitrator will give you an official answer" question.

My take is that you check for whether the attack is AP when rolling for the attack (which is when you are making an attack). That's when you count it as one of the uses of the ability.

Why is Wahab an illegal target? Aren't targets of indirect fire LEGAL targets?

The only exception would be an energy attack, in which case the shot could not be made. But if the attack were ballistic, it can still be made against Wahab behind blocking - just with a +3 modifier and a 2-damage max.

Indirect targets are illegal targets for direct fire. When you declare a direct fire attack, targets behind blocking are illegal targets. You can only fire indirectly if you say so when you nominate the target - which is BEFORE Wahab's ability activates.

Suffice to say, you cannot force a direct attack into an indirect one.

OKay ^^"
Thanks for your answer.
This help me alot.
^^v