Situation One:

My foe's V-Huntress gets two ranged attacks. I have my V-Doombot taxi E-Moonknight so that Moonie is at base contact with Huntress. Doombot is within Huntress' line of fire.

Question: Can Huntress shoot at both Moonie and Doomie?
I thought that if a character was based with another then they could not use a ranged attack.

Situation Two:

Solomon Grundy is adjacent to friendly Green Lantern.
Infront of Grundy is a object.
The player has GL taxi Grudy and at the same time has Grundy pick up the object that was infront of him.

Question: Is this legal? More specifically, can Grundy pickup the object "for free" while being taxied by GL?

Thank you.

Situation 1:
Since Huntress does not fly, she can not perform a ranged combat action while adjacent to an opposing figure. Your Doombot is safe from Huntress for this turn.

Situation 2:
Grundy is the one that has to be given the move action in order to pick up the object. He isn't able to pick up the object while being taxied.

1. Flyers can range, even if they are based by an enemy. A non-flier, however, cannot make ranged attacks against non-adjacent figures.

2. No, Grundy can't pick up the object. Even more, if Grundy is even holding an object, he can't be taxied.

Thanks for the responses fellas.

I was unaware that a flyer could not taxi a character that was carrying an object. Thank you.

My V-Storm and R-SHIELD Agent are 10 squares distant from enemy E-Raven. Next to Raven is R-Steel.
Raven is within LOF, but not Steel. I use the SHIELD TA to boost Storm's EE damage to two.
I need a 16 to hit Raven. I roll a 15 and miss Raven. Do I hit Steel ( his DV is 15)?

You have to hit the primary target(s) of an EE attack first, then check and see if adjacent characters are also hit. Since you stated Steel was out of LOF, it wouldn't matter if V Storm had 2 bolts, she couldn't hit Steel, and the EE won't damage him since the primary target, Raven, was missed.

ummm, non-flyers can't use ranged attacks at all if based by another non-flyer.

Unless of course they are using RCE, right? Or have they managed to FAQ that since you pointed out that ugly rule loop hole last week?

True or False?

Huntress with two ranged attacks is adjacent to both enemy MoonKnight and enemy (hovering) Doombot.
She can range attack both of them.

True or False?

Cyclops is adjacent to three enemy figures. He can use RCE against all three.

True or False?

An object is in the square in front of a character with superstrength. He can pick it up without taking an action token. Furthermore he doesn't have to move to pick it up, since it is close enough to grab.

Sorry to rehash this, but my friend and I are still not seeing eye to eye, and the previous answers have been interpreted differently.

False. Huntress is a non-flyer so she cannot make any ranged attack when based by an opposing non-flyer, ie. moon knight.


False. RCE works only for single targeted attacks.


False. The character must take a movement action in order to pick up an object. He doesn't necessarily need to move, but he does need to be given the action.

Huntress cannot make any ranged attacks because she is based by a non-flier.

Cyclops could only target three adjacent figs with ranged attacks if they were ALL fliers. One non-flier would negate his ability to use a ranged attack.

Picking up an object requires an action, but the character would not need to move to pick it up if it was adjacent to the character.

Just to play devil's advocate here, but this is what Psylocke Lover posted last week about RCE and adjacency:

So the answer isn't as cut and dired as y'all might think

Of course, you still can't use RCE and multi-arrow attacks together. At least that bit is still true...

Just to clarify, you DO need to take a move ACTION to pick it up, even though the character doesn't have to physically move anywhere.

Poor wording on my part, I'm sorry. I was trying to indicate that non-fliers could make a ranged attack against an adjacent character (if that character is a flier) but cannot make ranged attacks against anyone who is not adjacent.